Viewing entries tagged
kea

Targeted aerial rat responses no worries for native birds in the Perth River Valley

Targeted aerial rat responses no worries for native birds in the Perth River Valley

ZIP’s predator elimination model involves removing predators from a specific area and then protecting it from reinvasion. After the elimination operation, we intensely monitor the area and quickly respond to any predator detections using a range of techniques, one of which is the targeted application of aerial 1080 around the detection site.

Native birds in the Perth River Valley are recovering just as well in areas that have had one or more of these localised aerial treatments, when compared to surrounding areas that were only treated during the main elimination operation.

Earlier this year we reported positive signs of bird recovery in the Perth River Valley following our operation to eliminate possums, rats and stoats. In this update, we take a closer look at how this recovery looks in areas of the valley that have received different numbers of toxin applications. This work is part of the Predator Free South Westland project.

Setting up a trail camera. A MotoLure that dispenses mayonnaise is placed in the camera’s field of view to attract predators. Photo by Chad Cottle.

In 2019 we removed over 99% of predators in the Perth River Valley by applying aerial 1080 bait to all potential habitat in an elimination operation. We always anticipated that some predators might survive the operation or could reinvade the area over time; after all, an elimination approach requires us to protect the conservation gains we make. Our network of 142 lured trail cameras helps us detect these individuals so we can respond quickly to remove them.

Possums sneaking a snack of mayonnaise are caught in the act by a trail camera.

Usually, our first response to a predator detection is a ground-based operation using bait stations, traps and detection dogs. In some cases, however, the terrain makes this approach impractical and/or a ground-based response is not enough to prevent the emergent predators from spreading. When this happens, we use an aerial treatment of 1080 bait precisely targeted to the localised area where predators have been detected. The confluence of the Perth and Barlow Rivers seems to be particularly prone to reinvasion of rats from across the Barlow River, and has been treated on numerous occasions over the past three years (shaded dark grey in the map below).

Perth River Valley predator elimination project area. Grey shading shows the frequency of localised aerial treatments since 2019. Each dot represents a trail camera set up in front of a lure dispenser.

We sometimes get asked if this use of localised aerial treatments is slowing the recovery of native birds present in the Perth River Valley site. There is plenty of scientific evidence that native bird populations do better when predators are controlled (see references, below). Here, we investigated our camera network to see if there was any difference in native bird recovery between areas that had been treated multiple times and areas that only received the initial elimination treatment. Although trail cameras are primarily used to detect predators, they also detect native birds that happen to pass by. When we compare the proportion of cameras that detect birds, at the same sites, over time, we can get an indication of the relative size of these populations.

We looked at three species— kea, kakaruai/South Island robin, and ngirungiru/South Island tomtit. These species are known to be vulnerable to predation and we therefore expect their populations to recover when predators are removed. They are also the species that spend a lot of time on the forest floor and, because the cameras are low to the ground, are detected most consistently. We know that detections fluctuate over the year, peaking in summer with new fledglings. By comparing two late summer months, these seasonal variations are minimised.

We compared the number of cameras that detected birds in January 2020 (one month before any localised treatments took place) with February 2022 (one month after the most recent treatment for which we have analysed data) in areas that had received either none, between one and two, and three or more localised treatments.

Trail camera detections in January 2020 and February 2022 of kea, kakaruai/South Island robin, and ngirungiru /South Island tomtit in areas of the Perth River Valley that have received different numbers of aerial treatments. Numbers of cameras in each area ranged: 0 treatments, n=25; 1-2 treatments, n=54; and 3+ treatments, n=42

In areas that have received localised aerial treatments, more cameras are detecting kea and ngirungiru than two years ago. Kakaruai detections have remained reasonably stable, which is not surprising given the relatively low number of detections. The very low numbers (or lack) of species detections in areas that have not been treated beyond the initial elimination operation was surprising. However, this result may be explained in part by the habitat type most of these cameras were in (higher altitude in some cases, and the narrow, colder Upper Perth River Valley) where we would expect to find fewer native birds. Across the whole Valley, predator numbers are close to zero, so predation is unlikely to be a factor.

These camera detection results support the increase in birdlife that our field team are seeing and experiencing first-hand. Native bird populations continue to recover in the Perth River Valley, and the localised treatments to maintain predator freedom are not hindering that recovery.

A pair of kea show off in front of a lured trail camera, June 2022

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Matt Hickson of the Department of Conservation for a review of an earlier draft of this update.

References

Kemp, J. R., Mosen, C. C., Elliott, G. P., & Hunter, C. M. (2018). Effects of the aerial application of 1080 to control pest mammals on kea reproductive success. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 42(2), 158–168.

Miskelly, C. M., Greene, T.  C., McMurtrie, P. G., Morrison, K., Taylor, G. A., Tennyson, A. J. D., & Thomas, B. W. (2021). Species turnover in forest bird communities on Fiordland islands following predator eradications. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 45(2), 1–15.

Schadewinkel, R. B., Senior, A. M., Wilson, D. J., & Jamieson, I. G. (2014). Effects on South Island robins (Petroica australis) from pest control using aerially applied 1080 poison. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 315–321.

van Heezik, Y., Ray, S. M., Jamieson, I. G., Allen, O., & Schadewinkel, R. (2020). Impacts of aerial 1080 predator control on nest success and adult survival of South Island robins. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 44(2), 1–11.

ZIP accommodation no match for kea in Predator Free South Westland back-country

ZIP accommodation no match for kea in Predator Free South Westland back-country

On Thursday 28 April, ZIP field rangers returned to their tent in the Perth River Valley to find that kea had reduced it to shreds. The Perth River Valley is a remote and rugged 12,000 hectare site within the footprint of the Predator Free South Westland project area. ZIP has been working to eliminate possums, rats and stoats from the site since 2018, and the area is now effectively predator-free.

The large tent, located at the confluence of the Perth and Barlow Rivers and affectionately referred to by the team as the ‘Content’, has been a permanent fixture in the Perth River Valley field site since late 2020. While the field team have enjoyed frequent encounters with kea at the Content, this was the first encounter in which kea in this part of the field site had lived up to their reputation for mischief and destruction – and they certainly made up for lost time!

During the weekend of Saturday 30 April, the team returned to remove the damaged tent, and found a mob of eight unbanded juvenile kea on, and around, it. As gear was removed from the tent, the birds amused themselves by climbing over the neatly stacked equipment, undoing packages and opening boxes.

The tent, wooden base and all, was removed from the site and returned to the ZIP field base in Franz Josef, where it will undergo some sorely-needed repairs and maintenance. Fortunately for the team, the tent fly appears to have sustained most of the damage, so with the purchase of a new fly the Content should live to fight another day – perhaps at another location within the Predator Free South Westland project area.

ZIP Chief Executive Al Bramley says, “While certainly inconvenient for our rangers, this encounter is another positive sign that kea in the area are continuing to do very well in the absence of possums, rats and stoats. The team is thrilled to be seeing the results of our work with Predator Free South Westland to protect these charismatic, cheeky birds, and we look forward to seeing what hijinks they get up to next!”

Great news: Native birds are beginning to recover in the Perth River valley!

Great news: Native birds are beginning to recover in the Perth River valley!

We are delighted to report that native birds have begun to recover in the Perth River valley, just 18 months after our winter 2019 predator removal operation successfully eliminated stoats. In July, follow up actions removed the last resident possum, and we have now almost finished off the last few rats.

We recently analysed almost two years’ worth of native bird detections from our network of 142 lured trail cameras. In the graphs below, these detections are broken down by the percentage of the camera network that detected each species every seven days.

Note:

  1. There are currently two gaps in the data, on November 1-21 and April 14-28, in which footage has not yet been processed. We will update the graphs as soon as this footage review is complete.

  2. The camera network has also infrequently detected ruru (morepork) throughout the survey period.

The lured camera network is low to the ground, and is designed to detect possums, rats and stoats, not native birds. Therefore, these incidental records are unlikely to show the full extent of recovery as a result of the predator elimination. Nevertheless, this network has provided us with rich data about the activity and relative abundance of a wide range of species within the Perth River valley—demonstrating once again the versatility and value of this camera tool.

 

Highlights

 

Kea

Juvenile kea in the Perth River valley, March 2020 (Chad Cottle)

The Kea Conservation Trust (KCT) and DOC have reported that kea up and down the West Coast double-clutched (mated and raised fledglings twice) during the 2019-20 breeding season.

Our observations in the Perth River valley support this conclusion. Fledgling kea were spotted in the site as early as October 2019, and as late as March 2020, and young kea in different age classes have been seen within the same period. This indicates that kea have had a very successful breeding season, which is likely to be significantly enhanced by the absence of stoats in the valley.

Both ZIP team members and experienced helicopter pilots continue to report frequent kea sightings during their work in the field site, including a memorable encounter with 13 juvenile kea in February 2020, and another with 27 juvenile kea in April 2020.

Kākā

A juvenile kākā caught on camera in the Perth River valley during July 2020

Before the predator removal operation, no kākā were detected on camera in the Perth River valley. Kākā were first encountered by our field rangers in the field site in August 2019, after the completion of the operation. Adults and juveniles have since been detected in the camera network on several occasions, by 12 different cameras throughout the site.

In June 2020, two of our field rangers captured the footage below of a kākā feeding on a rotten standing tree trunk near the confluence of the Perth and Barlow Rivers. Since September of this year, our team has reported increasing sightings of kākā within the same area. In November 2020, kākā were seen for the first time in both the Teichelmann Creek and Lower Barlow areas.

Kākā nest in holes in tree trunks. This makes them extremely vulnerable to predation by stoats, which can kill eggs, chicks and incubating adults in a single attack. A five-year study at Lake Paringa, South Westland, between 2010 and 2015, found that thirty times more kākā chicks were produced in an area after 1080 treatment than in an area where no 1080 was used.

We are therefore pleased, but not hugely surprised, that the successful elimination of stoats from the Perth River valley has led to an increase in kākā sightings. We look forward to seeing this population thrive!

Yellow-Crowned Kākāriki

Before the predator removal operation, yellow-crowned kākāriki were very infrequently heard by our field rangers during the course of their work. They are now regularly heard by field rangers up and down the Barlow Valley, and have been seen beneath the forest canopy on several occasions, including the sighting below in October this year.

Kererū

A kereru caught on camera in the Perth River valley, June 2020

Before the predator removal operation, kererū were frequently sighted by our field team. However, no kererū were detected in our camera network until after the first phase of the operation. Over the last year, our team members have regularly seen kererū throughout the field site, and have even occasionally encountered large flocks of 30 or more birds!

Whio

Whio in the Perth River valley, May 2020 (Chad Cottle)

Whio (blue ducks) were detected on just two cameras in the field site during 2019, before the predator removal operation, and on four cameras in 2020. The relatively low number of detections is not surprising, given that whio live on the river, and the camera network is primarily located in the bush! During the 2019-20 breeding season, whio ducklings were spotted on several occasions by members of the ZIP field team in the upper Barlow River area—the first time since we began work in the site in early 2018. In November 2020, rangers reported seeing whio ducklings in two tributaries of the Perth River.

Female whio are especially vulnerable to stoats during the nesting season, and rats and possums have been known to destroy whio nests and eggs, so the elimination of these species is expected to have a positive impact on the Perth River valley whio population.

Whio naturally live at low densities on the large, flood-prone rivers of South Westland, with an average of 1 pair per km of river. The modest increase in whio sightings and detections we have observed since the predator elimination is a very positive indication that the population is beginning to recover in the absence of predators.

 

Tauhou (silvereye)

Two tauhou (silvereye) caught on camera in July 2020

Interestingly, silvereye activity appears to be highly seasonal, with dramatic increases in detections during the winter months, and reduced activity during the warmer months. So far, there has been no observable impact either way on the population as a result of the predator elimination.

Ngirungiru (tomtit)

A female ngirungiru (tomtit) in the Perth River valley field site, June 2020 (Chad Cottle)

A ngirungiru (tomtit) nest in the Perth River valley field site, December 2020 (Chad Cottle)

Ngirungiru activity also appears to be highly seasonal; however a general increase in detections can be observed following the predator removal operation. In February 2020, seven months after the operation, ngirungiru detections peaked at 22%, compared with 15% in February 2019.

Ngirungiru are frequently seen by our field team in all areas of the field site.

 

Kakaruai (South Island robin)

A kakaruai (South Island robin) photographed in the Upper Barlow area (Chad Cottle)

Our team regularly see kakaruai around the Perth River valley. The bird pictured above is a regular visitor to ZIP’s bivvy in the Upper Barlow area.

The footage below was recently captured by one of our field rangers near a tributary of the Barlow River, where a friendly kakaruai cleaned her boot and gaiter.

Kārearea (falcon)

Kārearea are frequently seen and heard around the Perth River field site, including one that is regularly sighted near the Upper Barlow bivvy.

 

Ruru (morepork)

Ruru photographed in the Perth River field site, July 2020 (Chad Cottle)

Ruru are occasionally seen and heard by our field rangers, and detected by our camera network.

The ruru above was photographed by one of our rangers in July 2020 near a tributary of Scone Creek, after it landed nearby looking rather unhappy to have been woken up!

 

Koekoeā (long-tailed cuckoo)

Koekoeā have been regularly heard throughout the Perth River valley during spring and summer 2020, particularly around the Upper Barlow River area.

 

Tūī and korimako (bellbird)

Camera detections of both tūī and korimako have increased during the last year, and both species are regularly seen and heard throughout the field site.

An encounter with 27 kea in the Perth River valley, April 2020

An encounter with 27 kea in the Perth River valley, April 2020

The ZIP field team returned to work in the Perth River valley on Tuesday 28 April, shortly after the COVID Level Four restrictions were lifted. Our field ranger Mike and his possum detection dog Pepper spent their first night back in the field camping by the headwaters of the Barlow River, where they were tasked with tracking down a possum we had detected in our network of lured trail cameras.

The following morning they awoke at 5:00am to a tell-tale cacophony of shrieks and an ominous rustling. They dragged themselves outside, and were shocked to find their ultra-hardy canvas storage bags and dry bags chewed to ribbons, gear strewn about the campsite, and several juvenile kea engaged in a serious attempt to dismantle their tent.

It’s normal for our team to camp in single-person tents, with some gear stored outside the tent, packed in dry bags and thick canvas storage bags to protect it from weather and the odd curious kea. While there have been a few minor instances of kea interfering with gear at other locations in the Perth River valley, we have never experienced such a targeted, sustained attack at this particular campsite!

Some of the gear in question. Not pictured: an electronic rifle scope that will probably never be seen again!

While Pepper watched from a safe distance, shaking ‘like a fish’, Mike counted an incredible 27 birds at the tahr camp, and caught the encounter on video (see below). Then, man and dog gathered what was left of their field gear and made a hasty retreat to the nearest bivvy.

The large number of young kea seen during this encounter coincides with the end of the fledgling season (November to May), a time when all juveniles from the previous breeding season reach independence. Although Mike and Pepper may not have been smiling at the time, a close encounter with such a large flock of juveniles is a very positive sign, and we are delighted by the frequent kea sightings reported by all of our field rangers. Along with the results of our recent kea survey, we are seeing increasing evidence that the Perth River kea population is thriving as we work to protect the site against possums, rats and stoats.

A few of the guilty kea…

Kea survey in the Perth River valley, March 2020

Kea survey in the Perth River valley, March 2020

On Wednesday 18 March, ZIP worked with several members of the South Westland community to conduct a kea survey in and around the Perth River valley field site. The purpose of the survey was to provide additional information to help us more confidently estimate the effect of our 2019 predator removal operation on the local kea population.

Background

ZIP has been working in the Perth River valley since early 2018. At this site we are testing and refining an approach to completely remove possums, rats and stoats from large areas, and then prevent them from re-establishing, for the long-term, sustainable protection of native species such as kea.

When we began work in the Perth River valley, experienced kea catchers spent three days banding kea within the field site. During this work, they caught and banded 55 kea, and estimated a total population of 75-100 kea within the area.

In autumn/winter 2019, we carried out an initial predator removal in the 12,000 ha field site using a modified technique for applying aerial 1080. While we anticipated that the complete removal of predators would have significant long-term benefits for kea in the valley, we recognised the need to mitigate any potential risks to kea that this modified technique might present. In the months leading up to the predator removal operation, we worked with DOC and the Kea Conservation Trust to develop and deploy two new methods to protect kea during the operation (alongside a range of more standard risk mitigation measures that were already in place).

Prior to the operation, we exposed kea to non-toxic baits that mimicked the look and smell of toxic baits, containing the bird repellent anthraquinone. This bait was used to train kea to avoid cereal baits.

To attract kea to these aversion baits, we also placed tahr carcasses (repurposed from tahr control operations) at several sites above the altitudinal boundary of the operational area.

Our research confirmed that tahr carcasses are highly attractive to kea, and capable of drawing groups of kea to specific locations within the field site. So, in winter 2018, we field trialled the use of trail cameras lured with tahr carcasses to survey kea at several alpine locations within the site. The images gathered from this network of cameras suggested a similar population to the kea catchers’ estimate.

In late 2019, after we had completed the predator removal operation, we carried out another survey using camera traps lured with tahr carcasses, to help us understand the effect of the operation on the kea population. The numbers of kea seen on camera during this work were similar to those seen in winter 2018, suggesting that the initial impact of our predator removal operation on the kea population was likely to have been small.

The March 2020 survey

The March 2020 survey was carried out at eight locations (marked as blue dots on the map below) in and around the Perth River valley field site. Tahr carcasses were used to attract kea to each of the survey locations.

We were grateful to be supported on the day by Kaylyn and Marcus Pinney (Te Taho Deer Park/ New Zealand Deerstalkers Association), Ashley Cassin (Chair of the Glacier Country Tourism Group), Cliff Goodwin (Glacier Valley Eco Tours) and Su Sinclair (Project Support Manager, Predator Free 2050 Limited). Gus Gordon (Glacier Country Helicopters) helped us select the survey locations and place the tahr carcasses.

One of the eight alpine locations at which kea were surveyed (Joseph Arand)

At each of the survey locations, we worked with Kaylyn, Marcus, Ash, Cliff and Su to conduct five hourly kea counts, between 7:30am and 11:30am. Each time a kea was counted, we noted whether it was on the tahr carcass itself, or simply perched nearby. We also recorded any banded individuals we were able to identify, and synchronised the counts to minimise the chance of double counting birds.

A group of four kea photographed during the March 2020 kea survey (Briar Cook)

Over the course of the survey, between 25 and 39 kea were counted at the beginning of each hourly period (or an average of 30 per hour). This rate of sightings is similar to the rate at which kea were photographed by our trail cameras before the predator removal operation, and suggests that the number of kea now living in the valley is unlikely to have changed.

It was a great experience to head up on the kea observation trip alongside Cliff Goodwin (owner/operator Glacier Valley Eco Tours). We were in an amazing spot and observed a good population of kea on our hourly inspections. With multiple locations observed at the same time, it was interesting to see the large numbers of kea that were present at certain sites.
— Ashley Cassin, Franz Josef Glacier Hotpools
It was interesting to discuss the ZIP program with [Science and Technical Ranger] Briar, and the ambitious nature of their plans. Being on the ground we could appreciate the scale of the area and how well the team has done to get the possum numbers down to just 3 animals. We appreciated the opportunity to see what is happening and we look forward to seeing how the project goes in the coming years.
— Marcus and Kaylyn Pinney, Te Taho Deer Park/ New Zealand Deerstalkers Association

A juvenile kea spotted during the March 2020 kea survey (Marcus and Kaylyn Pinney)

Along with the many kea sightings our rangers enjoy while going about their work, helicopter pilot Gus Gordon’s recent estimate of 100-200 kea (based on the large numbers he has spotted while placing tahr for our survey and risk mitigation work), and the large collection of images captured by our trail cameras (including the one below), the results of this survey make us confident that there has been little change to this population.

A group of six juvenile kea caught on camera at a tahr carcass in August 2019

A group of six juvenile kea caught on camera at a tahr carcass in August 2019

The relatively large population of kea in the valley can likely be attributed in part to a long history of predator control in the area. DOC has carried out five aerial 1080 operations here since 1997, which will have given several generations of kea an opportunity to breed successfully. Another factor is that these kea have had access to an abundance of nutrient-rich food in the form of tahr carcasses left by trophy hunters and by DOC’s tahr control operations.

The continued strong population of kea also suggests that the combined use of aversion bait and tahr carcasses has been largely successful in mitigating risks to kea from ZIP’s predator removal operation.

Seeing a healthy population of kea in the Perth River valley a year after our predator removal operation is hugely rewarding. We expect this population will continue to flourish as we learn to maintain an area free from the impact of possums, rats and stoats.

The work ZIP’s doing in the Perth River valley is really necessary to help protect kea. These birds are intelligent, so we need to train them not to eat the baits while still getting rid of the rats, stoats and possums. ZIP has put a lot of work and thought into reducing risks to kea from 1080, and it’s been bloody awesome to see so many kea in the valley a year after their operation.
— Gus Gordon, Glacier Country Helicopters

Taonga species in the Perth River valley, South Westland

Taonga species in the Perth River valley, South Westland

While our field team is working in the Perth River valley they have the great pleasure of regularly seeing kea, pīwauwau (rock wren) and whio. This update shares videos that one of our rangers has taken of these special birds.

A group of up to 10 kea were caught on film in the Upper Barlow area in May, after the first phase of the predator removal operation.

This whio was spotted alongside the Lower Barlow River, approximately one month after the completion of the predator removal operation.

Several pīwauwau (rock wren) were also filmed in the Prospectors Creek area during monitoring in April this year.

So far, we have not seen any possums, rats or stoats in the area since the predator removal operation was completed. We expect that this means kea, whio and pīwauwau will all have a very good upcoming breeding season.

Update on Perth River Valley Project – opportunities to reduce risk to kea

Update on Perth River Valley Project – opportunities to reduce risk to kea

Updated Wednesday 19 July 2018

Zero Invasive Predators Ltd (ZIP), with the support of the Department of Conservation (DOC) and Predator Free 2050 Limited, is currently undertaking a programme of research and development work in the Perth River valley on the West Coast of the South Island.

The purpose of the work is to test and refine an approach to completely remove possums from large areas and prevent them from re-establishing, and to develop this approach for ship rats and stoats. We call the approach ‘Remove and Protect’. This is the first time such an attempt has been made on the New Zealand mainland. The results are expected to help enable New Zealand to achieve predator-free status by 2050.

The Perth River research area contains kea, which is a nationally endangered species. The purpose of this Update is to outline some new measures that we are progressing to mitigate potential impacts on kea of the work underway in the Perth River research area. 

Background

Kea are the world’s only mountain parrot and considered by scientists to be one of the most intelligent bird species in the world. The national population of kea is expected to decline by 50-70% over the next 10 years unless the causes of decline are addressed.  Predation by introduced predators like possums and stoats is considered one of the key reasons for the decline in kea numbers. 

One component of ZIP’s ‘Remove and Protect’ approach that is being tested and refined in the Perth River research area is the use of a method called ‘1080 to Zero’ to completely remove predators.

Predator control using aerial 1080 has an overall beneficial impact on kea nesting success. In one recently published study, kea nest survival at a monitored site increased from 46.4%, before the application of 1080 to 84.8% after the application of 1080 (Kemp et al. 2018). 

However, kea have an inquisitive nature, and some kea have died as a result of 1080 poisoning. Consequently, from its inception, the research and development work programme in the Perth River valley has actively considered ways to reduce risk to kea. 

Steps already taken to reduce risk to kea in the Perth River research area

Minimising the risk to kea was part of the decision making process when it came to deciding the location of the Perth River research area. We reduced the size of the original proposed research area from c.20,000ha to 12,000ha, to lessen the number of kea exposed to 1080 baits (the 1080 to Zero treatment area is only 7,500ha).

The research area was located as far as possible from the nearest kea scrounging site, Franz Josef township, which is 28km away at its closest point. We also selected an area that had a history of aerial 1080 operations – in this case five operations since 1997. The site was also selected on the basis of a number of other criteria related to our research requirements.

Since then, 30 kea have been fitted with radio transmitters (and another 25 have been banded) to monitor the impact of applying aerial 1080 on kea mortality and breeding success. Radio-tagged kea are scheduled to be monitored (using a light aircraft) after each application of prefeed and toxic bait. Monitoring was done after each of the two prefeeds that were applied on 30-31 May and 21 June.

We also recently completed a project to estimate how likely kea would be to consume baits, in order to assist DOC to decide whether the toxic bait application should proceed. In summary, the results confirmed what was already known - i.e. that kea interact with bait. However, owing to the small sample size, it was not possible to make a specific estimate of the likely level of actual consumption of toxic bait. 

Two new measures to mitigate potential impacts on kea

It was originally estimated that around 18 kea were likely to be present in the research area. During the course of our work, we discovered that there is a healthy population of approximately 75-100 kea in the research area. It is likely that the current population of kea can be partly attributed to the benefits of the previous five applications of aerial 1080 in the area.

We are committed to doing all we can to reduce the risk of kea mortality in the event that the decision is made to apply aerial 1080. Recently we have initiated two new measures to help achieve this.

Discourage kea from eating 1080 bait

To reduce the risk of birds consuming toxic bait, we are attempting to enable kea to learn that eating bait is not good for them, by applying non-toxic prefeed bait containing a repellent, anthraquinone, that makes them feel sick, before any toxic bait is applied.

Anthraquinone is a secondary repellent in that it has no smell or flavour, but makes birds feel sick after consumption. By associating the bait with the source of illness, birds will be less likely to eat it in future.

On Saturday 14th July, with the permission of the Department of Conservation, green-dyed baits laced with anthraquinone were applied within a thin band along a section of the alpine boundary of the research area.

This non-toxic bait was dyed green, in order to resemble the toxic bait as closely as possible.

We may reinforce any repellent effect with a repeat application of repellent bait, immediately prior to toxin baiting. The thinking behind doing this is that the more times kea have the opportunity to learn to avoid the bait, the greater the chance that they will avoid it in future.

Provide tahr carcasses as alternative food/distraction

Our field staff have observed, and there is substantial anecdotal evidence, that kea in this area already quickly locate and utilise dead tahr (either left by hunters or dead from natural causes) as a food source.

On Friday 29 June, the carcasses of 21 tahr shot by a DOC ranger (using a high-powered rifle – not lead shot), as part of a DOC’s wider programme of tahr control, were placed at approximately 1km intervals along the upper boundary of the 1080 to Zero treatment zone, in order to lure kea away from the baits.

Kea activity at each tahr carcass is being monitored using trail cameras, in order to help us understand whether this approach plays a role in limiting any impact from the aerial operation. Our staff have already observed a number of birds visiting the carcasses.

There is strong evidence to suggest that the risk to kea of secondary poisoning (i.e. from eating the meat of animals that have been poisoned by baits) is much lower than the risk of primary poisoning (i.e. from eating baits) following an aerial 1080 operation (van Klink and Crowell 2015).

Furthermore, it is not known if aerial 1080 impacts tahr. This is being investigated as part of a Game Animal Council-led project connected with the proposed aerial operation in the Perth River research area.

We will continue to record activity at the tahr sites from now until any toxic bait is rendered safe. From this data, it should be possible to determine whether or not the kea maintain interest in the tahr carcasses in the presence of bait.

Final thought

DOC is currently reconsidering the permission for ZIP to apply aerial 1080 as part of the Perth Valley research project.

Ultimately, the decision about whether to apply aerial 1080 in the research area will balance the risk of individual kea mortality against the potential population benefits to kea (and other native species) in the research area, as a result of predator removal, and the benefits of continuing to test, refine and develop the Remove and Protect approach and its potential contribution to a Predator Free New Zealand.

We will continue to provide updates via the ZIP website as this work progresses.

 

Reference

Kemp JR, Mosen C, Elliott GP, Hunter CM. (2018). The effects of aerial poisoning for pest mammal control on the productivity of the kea (Nestor notabilis). New Zealand Journal of Ecology 42.

Van Klink, P. A., & Crowell, M. D. (2015). Kea (Nestor notabilis) survivorship through a 1080 operation using cereal baits containing the bird repellent d-pulegone at Otira, central Westland. Publishing Team, Department of Conservation.